Sign Up

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have a permission to ask a question, You must login to ask question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here
Sign InSign Up

Edufavor

Edufavor
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Learn
  • Categories
  • Stories
  • Search
  • FAQs
Home / Questions /Q 1917
Next
Answered
Aparna
Aparna

Aparna

  • Lucknow, India
  • 601 Questions
  • 0 Answers
  • 0 Best Answers
  • 678 Points
View Profile
Aparna
Asked: September 29, 20212021-09-29T16:09:54+05:30 2021-09-29T16:09:54+05:30In: Polity

What is Twenty-Fourth Amendment Act,1971?

What is Twenty-Fourth Amendment Act, 1971?

constitution amended
  • 1
  • 1
  • 310
Answer
Share
  • Facebook

    1 Answer

    • Recent
      • 0 Questions
      • 518 Answers
      • 176 Best Answers
      • 0 Points
      View Profile
      Best Answer
      [Deleted User]
      2021-09-29T16:14:12+05:30Added an answer on September 29, 2021 at 4:14 pm
      This answer was edited.

      Twenty-Fourth Amendment Act, 1971

      • Affirmed the power of Parliament to amend any part of the Constitution including fundamental rights.
      • Made it compulsory for the president to give his assent to a Constitutional Amendment Bill.

       

       NOTE:

      • It was introduced to amend article 368 suitably for the purpose and made it clear that article 368 provides for amendment of the Constitution as well as procedure therefore.
      • It was also introduced to amend article 13 of the Constitution to make it inapplicable to any amendment of the Constitution under article 368

      Background

      • The Supreme Court in the well-known Golak Nath’s case [1967] reversed, by a narrow majority, its own earlier decisions upholding the power of Parliament to amend all parts of the Constitution including Part III relating to fundamental rights.
      • The result of Golak Nath’s case was that Parliament was considered to have no power to take away or curtail any of the fundamental rights guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution even if it becomes necessary to do so for giving effect to the Directive Principles of State Policy and for the attainment of the objectives set out in the Preamble to the Constitution.
      • 1
      • Reply
      • Share
        Share
        • Share on Facebook
        • Share on Twitter
        • Share on WhatsApp

    Leave an answer
    Cancel reply

    You must login or register to add a new answer.

    Related Questions

    • What is Fortieth Amendment Act, 1976?
    • What is Thirty-Eighth Amendment Act, 1975?

    Sidebar

    Ask A Question

    Explore

    • Home
    • Learn
    • Categories
    • Stories
    • Search
    • FAQs

    Footer

    EDUFAVOR

    A destined place on Internet where one can find a company of good peoples, where everyone grows together, love each other and enjoy flavored learning.

    Important Links

    Privacy Policy

    FOLLOW US

    © 2021 Edufavor. All Rights Reserved.

    Insert/edit link

    Enter the destination URL

    Or link to existing content

      No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.